I don't care if you disagree. The editorial history of the modern Bible is well established, and the facts of history don't change because you find them inconvenient.

Furthermore, what Mark 16:1-8 illustrates is not a resurrection narrative. All it states is that two women claimed to have found an open grave and someone sitting inside it claiming a resurrection occurred, and that someone wasn't even the supposed resurrectee. It could just as easily be interpreted that a theft of a body occurred and someone was trying to obscure such an act.

It hardly matters though. The Jesus of the bible never existed, and no one can demonstrate otherwise.